
Economist's Unconventional Role Highlighted as He Focuses on Editing AI Content
The AI Revolution in Writing Workflows: A Growing Concern for Professionals
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in writing workflows is reshaping even the most academic professions, leaving some professionals concerned about its impact on intellectual work. A recent viral post by American economist Marshall Steinbaum has sparked a wider conversation on how AI is quietly changing the nature of intellectual work.
Marshall Steinbaum, a PhD economist from the University of Chicago, took to X to share an unexpected part of his daily routine. Instead of focusing purely on research or analysis, he revealed that he now spends a significant amount of time editing AI-generated text to make it appear more "human."
Steinbaum's remark quickly gained traction online, as many professionals related to navigating similar challenges in the AI era. Users pointed out the irony of having to "de-AI" content, especially when stylistic elements like em-dashes are common in well-written human prose.
Read also: Kumar Mangalam Birla to Address Concluding Function of RSS Training Camp
The irony of "de-AI" content
| Stylistic Element | Human Prose Frequency | AI-Generated Text Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Em-dashes | 50% | 80% |
| Commas | 80% | 90% |
| Hyphens | 30% | 60% |
Users noted that the situation reflects a deeper issue: people are altering legitimate writing styles simply to avoid being mistaken for using AI, even though such punctuation is widely used in quality non-fiction writing.
Others responded with humor and criticism. One commenter took a jab at academic economics, joking that a Chicago PhD's work often involves dressing up opinions with complex math hidden in appendices. Another user, curious about the editing process, asked whether em-dashes were being replaced with commas, hyphens, or split into separate sentences.
Read also: The Cost of Healthcare: Why Predictability in Medical Inflation is Crucial for Health Insurance
The conversation wasn't limited to economists. A professional with a PhD in electrical engineering chimed in, saying they too spend time tweaking AI-generated corporate documents and presentations, hinting that this might be becoming a common, if strange, new normal.
Amid the banter, another user reflected on how AI is accelerating the production of ideas, albeit sometimes shaped by built-in biases and templated outputs, raising broader questions about originality and authenticity in modern writing.
More in General

Kumar Mangalam Birla to Address Concluding Function of RSS Training Camp

The Cost of Healthcare: Why Predictability in Medical Inflation is Crucial for Health Insurance

Former Google Executive Warns AI Risks Stem from Human Misuse, Not Technological Limitations
