Mutual Funds Embrace More Flexible Exit Load Structures

Mutual Fund Exit Loads Become More Flexible Across Equity Schemes

A recent analysis of scheme-level data has revealed that exit load structures across mutual fund categories are becoming more flexible, particularly in equity schemes. The analysis, which excludes exchange-traded funds (ETFs) where exit loads are typically not applicable, covered 830 active equity schemes.

Of these schemes, 302 explicitly carry no exit load, while 528 schemes continue to impose a charge. Among those that levy a load, Anand Rathi Wealth's data shows that exit loads average around 0.8%. The structure of exit periods has also softened, with 229 schemes requiring a 6–12 month holding period and 314 schemes applying exit loads for up to three months.

This marks a shift away from the earlier norm of a uniform 1% exit load for one year, with more schemes either eliminating the charge or restricting it to shorter durations. WhiteOak Capital Asset Management recently announced that they were removing exit loads for fresh investments on around 16 equity and hybrid funds.

Read also: Groww AMC Secures Strategic Boost as SEBI Approves State Street Global Advisors' Minority Stake

The company's CEO, Aashish Somaiya, explained that taxation itself acts as enough deterrent against excessive churn, hence the need to an exit load was minimal. "Capital gains taxes are enough deterrent for investors to avoid churning the assets in and out. Given this kind of taxation, investors would withdraw only if they need money or if funds are doing very badly. We don’t need to impose exit loads and add further to the cost of investing," he said.

Industry participants say the shift towards a zero exit load structure is also being driven by structural changes in investor behaviour and competitive dynamics. Anand Rathi Wealth's Shweta Rajani pointed to the rise of systematic investing, with monthly SIP inflows now crossing Rs 30,000 crore. "The mutual fund industry is moving toward lower and more flexible exit loads as investors become more SIP-driven and long-term focused," she said.

Rajani added that exit loads are evolving rather than disappearing. "Exit loads matter in categories where sudden redemptions can hurt existing investors, especially in small-cap and lower liquidity debt funds," she said. She also noted that today, exit loads act more as a liquidity management tool than just a penalty for short-term investing.

Read also: Mahindra Manulife Launches MPOWER SIF, Entering the Systematic Investment Fund Segment

PlanRupee's Amol Joshi noted that the industry has seen multiple attempts at removing exit loads, with mixed results. "There have been several AMCs that have tried this in the past. Many of them have rolled the exit load removal back for all schemes or retained only for few schemes," he said.

Joshi said exit loads continue to serve a purpose, even if limited. "Exit load prepares you upfront to stay invested for at least one year… it is just one of the ways to discourage short-term exit action," he said. At the same time, he noted that investor behaviour is not primarily driven by exit load structures. "A guided investor invests in equity for long-term wealth creation. Exit loads are discussed rarely," he said.

Joshi added that completely eliminating exit loads across the board may not be necessary. "Even a bank fixed deposit has a premature withdrawal penalty. A volatile equity product having exit load is well received," he said.