NIFTY23,4060.33%
SENSEX74,3460.41%
BANKNIFTY54,1860.88%
NIFTY IT29,3845.57%
PHARMA24,0870.33%
AUTO26,0930.05%
FMCG48,1241.01%
METAL13,5350.17%
REALTY762.601.39%
ENERGY40,1970.02%
NIFTY23,4060.33%
SENSEX74,3460.41%
BANKNIFTY54,1860.88%
NIFTY IT29,3845.57%
PHARMA24,0870.33%
AUTO26,0930.05%
FMCG48,1241.01%
METAL13,5350.17%
REALTY762.601.39%
ENERGY40,1970.02%

Trademark Dispute Update: Lacoste Prevails Over Crocodile International

On Monday, the Delhi High Court issued a ruling in a long-standing trademark conflict between Lacoste, a French luxury brand, and Crocodile International, a Hong Kong-based clothing manufacturer. The court upheld a previous single judge bench order that barred Crocodile International from using a crocodile logo found to infringe on Lacoste's trademark and copyright.

The division bench comprising Justices Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla ruled that Lacoste effectively proved infringement regarding its protected crocodile emblem and the specific creative copyright of its signature logo design. However, the court noted that Lacoste failed to meet the requirements for a passing-off claim, citing a lack of adequate evidence of goodwill needed to support this argument.

Key Developments

Read also: Kumar Mangalam Birla to Address Concluding Function of RSS Training Camp

  • The court dismissed Crocodile's defence that Lacoste had tacitly accepted or acquiesced to the use of the disputed mark over time.
  • Lacoste initiated legal proceedings in 2001 to safeguard its trademark and copyright interests within India.
  • The lawsuit aimed to prohibit Crocodile International and its Indian subsidiary from producing, marketing, or promoting clothing and merchandise featuring a crocodile emblem that was confusingly similar to Lacoste's own.
  • Crocodile International contested the legal action, arguing that the two parties had previously reached a coexistence agreement in various Asian markets.

Previous Rulings

  • In August 2024, a single judge of the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of Lacoste, issuing a permanent injunction barring Crocodile International from using the contested crocodile logo in India.
  • The court ordered Crocodile International to provide an account of its profits from the sale of any products bearing the infringing mark starting from August 1998 – the period when the firm first entered the Indian market – until the mark's use was discontinued.

Investor Takeaway

This ruling has a low impact on the market and is primarily a legal matter.

IPOScanner Logo

IPOScanner helps investors track upcoming, live and past IPOs in one place with GMP, subscription, allotment status and listing performance insights.

About IPO Scanner

IPOScanner is built for investors who want a clear view of every IPO opportunity in one place. From upcoming issues to live subscription data, allotment updates and listing performance, we bring together the key details you need to track the primary market.

Our tools are designed to be simple, fast and investor-friendly so you can focus on evaluating businesses instead of opening multiple tabs and websites for basic information.

Details of client bank account
For any query / feedback / clarifications, email at
[email protected].

Please read all offer documents and risk disclosures carefully before investing. IPOScanner does not provide investment advice and information on this site should not be treated as a recommendation to apply for any IPO.

© 2026 IPO Scanner. All rights reserved.