OPINION: Maximizing Returns on India's Domestic Savings Pool

India's $30 Trillion Economy Hinges on Better Capital Allocation

India's next phase of growth, crucial for building a $30 trillion economy by 2047, will be capital intensive. The country needs to fund infrastructure, housing, manufacturing, the energy transition, and the SME engine, requiring steady funding through cycles. While every budget season focuses on new schemes, fresh allocations, tax breaks, and incremental incentives, far less attention is given to how India manages the money it already has.

A Significant Pool of Domestic Capital

India has one of the world's largest pools of domestic capital. The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) holds roughly ₹26 lakh crore, while insurance companies manage over ₹65 lakh crore. The National Pension System (NPS) has crossed ₹16 lakh crore, and Public Provident Fund (PPF) has garnered more than ₹14 lakh crore. These numbers are amplified by small savings, sovereign funds, and other public pools, taking the total long-term public savings to ₹200 lakh crore or $2.2-2.3 trillion - one of the largest pools of domestic capital anywhere in the emerging world.

Read also: Treasury Yields Experience Largest Increase in Two Weeks Following Release of Labor Market Data

Savings Oversight: A Structural Issue

Quietly fuelling this growth is India's mutual fund industry, a genuine success story. SIP adoption is broad, retail participation is rising, and SEBI's governance has been credible. However, the problem is structural: these large public pools - EPFO, insurance, PPF, NPS - sit in separate departments, under different regulators, managed with distinct mandates. This leads to inefficient management, with EPFO's equity allocation at around 10%, PPF getting credited at a rate tied to g-sec yields, and insurance funds having limited exposure to diversified productive assets.

Savers Lose Out on the Power of Compounding

Over a 30-35 year working life, a gap of even 1-2 percentage points in risk-adjusted annual returns compounds into a dramatically different retirement outcome. At the scale of assets we are discussing, that gap translates to an estimated ₹36,000-54,000 crore of additional investment income annually - if even a third of the total corpus were professionally managed under a modern framework. This is a structural transfer of wealth back to Indian workers.

Read also: US-Iran Tensions Spark Uptick in Oil Prices Amid Global Market Decline

A Simple Solution

The solution does not require merging schemes, changing guarantees, or touching beneficiary rights. None of the institutions must abandon their mandate - EPFO remains the custodian of workers' provident savings, LIC continues to fulfill its insurance purpose, and PPF's lock-in and interest guarantee stay intact. The proposal is a more practical one: separate investment management from scheme administration, and route the former to professional, accountable management under a unified regulatory framework that maintains fiduciary standards while pursuing better risk-adjusted outcomes.

International Precedents

We can look at international precedents for inspiration. In the US, around half of insurance assets are externally managed. Malaysia's EPF outsources about 17% of its corpus to external managers - and that 17% generates about 24% of total investment income, a meaningful productivity differential. Japan's GPIF, managing nearly $1.9 trillion, operates under a unified governance framework with significant external mandates. In each case, the ownership and policy mandates of the fund remained with the sponsoring institution. What changed was how the money was invested.

A National Investment Management Framework

India needs a framework that harmonizes key metrics - a National Investment Management Framework that harmonizes policy, risk limits, and governance standards across these pools. This would include multiple regulated entities appointed through a competitive, transparent process to ensure competitive accountability and investor-first objectives, without displacing the institutions that carry public trust.

The Return Uplift

The return uplift comes from several levers working together: broader diversification across equities, corporate bonds, infrastructure debt, REITs, InvITs, and other asset classes consistent with long-term horizons; active alpha from professional credit and equity selection; and scale efficiencies that SEBI's telescopic pricing framework was designed to unlock.

A Macro Dividend

There is also a macro dividend. Large, professionally managed domestic pools can become stable anchor investors in infrastructure, corporate bonds, and high-quality growth capital. They can deepen domestic capital markets and reduce reliance on volatile foreign flows. Over time, the scale created through unified mandates could support one or two genuinely global Indian AMCs - institutions capable of competing internationally while financing India's development at home.

India's Capital Alignment

India does not lack savings or regulatory capacity. What it lacks is alignment across its long-term public pools. The capital required for the next phase of growth is already within the system. Organising it better, without disturbing guarantees, beneficiaries, or scheme design, may be the most consequential financial-sector reform still ahead.