India Tax Authorities Eased Rules on Pre-2018 Foreign Holdings

Income Tax Department Clarifies Legacy Investment Rules to Boost Investor Confidence

In a bid to protect legacy investments and boost investor confidence, the Income Tax Department has clarified that income arising from investments made by foreign entities prior to April 1, 2017 will not be subject to General Anti Avoidance Rule (GAAR) test. This means that authorities cannot deny tax treaty benefits to foreign entities who invested prior to the beginning of the 2017-18 financial year, even if the primary motive of the investment was to avoid taxes.

The clarification is aimed at providing certainty to foreign investors and reinforcing the "grandfathering" of pre-2017 investments, shielding them from GAAR. This counters the Tiger Global ruling of the Supreme Court, which had threatened these protections by questioning treaty benefits. The recent amendments to Income Tax Rules 2026 and 1962 have clarified that income from transfer of investments made prior to April 1, 2017 should be protected.

Tiger Global Ruling and Its Impact

Read also: Treasury Yields Experience Largest Increase in Two Weeks Following Release of Labor Market Data

The Supreme Court on January 16 had set aside a Delhi High Court order in favour of Mauritius-based Tiger Global International (TGI), and ruled that the capital gains arising out of its $1.6 billion-worth of stake sale in Flipkart, in 2018, is taxable by Indian authorities. The top court noted that the tax authorities have proved that the transactions in the "instant case are impermissible tax-avoidance arrangements", and the evidence prima-facie establishes that they "do not qualify as lawful". Thanks to the judgement, the Indian tax authorities got the green light to fetch a revenue of about Rs 1,000 crore from the Mauritius-based company.

The top court stated that once a transaction is found to be an impermissible tax avoidance arrangement, no treaty or grandfathering protection can apply. However, the recent amendments in the I-T rules have overturned this understanding.

Amendments to I-T Rules

Read also: US-Iran Tensions Spark Uptick in Oil Prices Amid Global Market Decline

The amendments to Rule 10(U) of the I-T rules of 1962 have dropped the "without prejudice" wording relied upon by the Supreme Court in the Tiger Global case. The earlier clause said: "Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-rule 1 (lists exemption from GAAR) the provisions of Chapter X-A (GAAR) shall apply to any arrangement, irrespective of the date on which it has been entered into, in respect of any tax benefit obtained from the arrangement on or after the 1st day of April, 2017." The amendments provide a degree of certainty for legacy investments, but questions around the interplay of GAAR with judicial GAAR and other anti-abuse principles in the tax treaties continue to warrant careful and nuanced analysis.

Arrangement vs Investment Debate

Experts say that the recent amendments to rules regarding GAAR grandfathering make the drafting clearer that income from transfer of investments which were made prior to April 1, 2017 should be protected. However, they warn that uncertainties remain regarding the "arrangement vs investment" distinction and the prospective nature of these new clarifications. The practical impact of the amendments may be clearer in the coming days.

The move from the government strikes an appropriate balance between curbing aggressive tax avoidance and preserving investor confidence. It will reduce litigation exposure for multi-national corporations operating across borders. However, taxpayers must remain cautious, on a prospective basis.