NIFTY23,4060.33%
SENSEX74,3460.41%
BANKNIFTY54,1860.88%
NIFTY IT29,3845.57%
PHARMA24,0870.33%
AUTO26,0930.05%
FMCG48,1241.01%
METAL13,5350.17%
REALTY762.601.39%
ENERGY40,1970.02%
NIFTY23,4060.33%
SENSEX74,3460.41%
BANKNIFTY54,1860.88%
NIFTY IT29,3845.57%
PHARMA24,0870.33%
AUTO26,0930.05%
FMCG48,1241.01%
METAL13,5350.17%
REALTY762.601.39%
ENERGY40,1970.02%

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Review: Resolving or Closing Businesses?

Key Statistics:

  • 2,952 cases ended in liquidation, while 1,376 cases were resolved through approved resolution plans as of December 2025 (IBBI data).
  • The IBC framework aims to resolve businesses, with liquidation as the last option.

IBC Philosophy: The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is designed to resolve businesses, preserving value and reviving operations. The Supreme Court in Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India emphasized that the Code prioritizes corporate debtor revival over creditor recovery.

Read also: Treasury Yields Experience Largest Increase in Two Weeks Following Release of Labor Market Data

CIRP Structure: The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) follows a structured approach:

  1. Admission of insolvency petition
  2. Appointment of Resolution Professional
  3. Formation of Committee of Creditors (CoC)
  4. Invitation of resolution plans
  5. Approval of the best resolution plan

Liquidation: Liquidation becomes relevant only when no viable resolution plan is available.

Delays and Challenges: Delays in the CIRP process, often due to litigation, regulatory approvals, and operational issues, can reduce business value and push cases towards liquidation.

Read also: US-Iran Tensions Spark Uptick in Oil Prices Amid Global Market Decline

Notable Resolutions: The IBC has facilitated successful resolutions, such as:

  • Essar Steel India Limited: Successfully acquired by ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel Corporation
  • Bhushan Power and Steel Limited: Taken over by JSW Steel under an approved resolution plan

Judicial Decisions: Landmark judgments, such as Swiss Ribbons, Essar Steel, and Ghanashyam Mishra, have clarified the IBC framework, but extensive litigation has contributed to delays.

Conclusion: The IBC's effectiveness in resolving businesses depends on the timing of insolvency filings. Early filings increase the likelihood of resolution, while late filings may lead to liquidation. Addressing delays and challenges in the CIRP process is crucial to preserving business value and promoting economic growth.

Investor Takeaway

Investors should be cautious of the effectiveness of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in resolving businesses.

IPOScanner Logo

IPOScanner helps investors track upcoming, live and past IPOs in one place with GMP, subscription, allotment status and listing performance insights.

About IPO Scanner

IPOScanner is built for investors who want a clear view of every IPO opportunity in one place. From upcoming issues to live subscription data, allotment updates and listing performance, we bring together the key details you need to track the primary market.

Our tools are designed to be simple, fast and investor-friendly so you can focus on evaluating businesses instead of opening multiple tabs and websites for basic information.

Details of client bank account
For any query / feedback / clarifications, email at
[email protected].

Please read all offer documents and risk disclosures carefully before investing. IPOScanner does not provide investment advice and information on this site should not be treated as a recommendation to apply for any IPO.

© 2026 IPO Scanner. All rights reserved.